They Called Trump’s Speech ‘Horrible.’ One Problem: He Hadn’t Given It Yet.

Interviews conducted by The Daily Wire recently exposed the depths of political polarization, especially within academic circles. Students reportedly offered overwhelmingly negative assessments of former President Donald Trump’s upcoming State of the Union address, describing the speech as “horrible.” The key detail: these interviews took place on February 24, 2026—a full day before the speech was even scheduled for the evening of February 25. X user Eyal Yakoby highlighted this discrepancy on February 25, sharing evidence of the pre-emptive condemnation.

Yakoby’s X post revealed a stunning level of pre-judgment. Without a single word spoken, a policy articulated, or a tone set, these students apparently stood ready to brand a major presidential address an unequivocal failure. This isn’t just strong political opinion; it’s a narrative so deeply entrenched it preempts reality itself. Such actions demand answers about critical thinking and the ability to engage with information objectively, especially regarding figures like former President Trump.

The Daily Wire asked students yesterday how Trump’s State of the Union speech was.

They all responded how horrible it was.

The only issue? It’s tonight.

Insane. pic.twitter.com/blJd9nagqp

— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) February 25, 2026

Former President Trump polarizes. State of the Union addresses typically draw partisan reactions *after* they are delivered. This incident shows an unprecedented pre-condemnation. For some, particularly on college campuses, animosity toward Trump now overrides basic intellectual honesty. It’s an ideological predisposition so strong it ignores facts, and even time itself. Many call such a reaction a “low IQ move,” where emotion crushes rational thought.

The Daily Wire, a conservative outlet challenging progressive narratives and perceived biases, inadvertently captured this phenomenon. Students dismissed an event sight unseen, solely based on who delivers it. This is deeply troubling. It suggests an environment where ideological conformity trumps genuine intellectual inquiry. When facts are ignored for pre-judgment, critical thinking dies. An informed citizenry and healthy academic discourse are at risk.

This episode powerfully reminds us: the battle isn’t just policy anymore. It’s over basic factual engagement. When opinion solidifies independent of reality, it rejects objective assessment, not just a politician. The incident forces reflection on how deep biases blind even educated individuals to fundamental critical thought. The facts are clear: a speech condemned before delivery. A profound lack of intellectual rigor on full display.

Photo: Punctured Bicycle / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain

Read more: AI Brings Elvis Presley Back to Life at 91